Safety first sun shade

Provocative agents with Montebello: the police force acknowledges. Reactionism Watch Centre-droite until right-hand side, we will supervise you until your total pulverization of the province of Quebec. Then, in America and, finally, of all the planet Ground. To contact us: reactionismwatch (At) gmail. The articles belong to their author respectively, which means that it does not represent necessarily the opinion of all the members of the collective. The texts and images which are creations of the team of Reactionism Watch are free of right. For all the remainder, that is to say the images and page-setting, do what you want. Our contents are only one cluster of images borrowed on various sites. If an artist recognizes one of his works here and that it wishes more to see it, we will withdraw it. Because one likes to have to you with the eye. Anarchopedia: Encyclopaedia on ḻ.Anarchism Association for a Trade-union Solidarity Coed. Center Alternative Media of Quebec. Committee of Mobilization for the Strike with ḻ.University Laval Committee for a red help Canadian North Eastern Federation of Anarchist Communists the blog with the claim n’.en to have any Matchafa: a collection of media to include/understand the world. On the lines - a trade-union chronicle After l’.Iraq, FOX attaque.l’.Iran Attack with freedom d’.expression: the police force of Montréal.censure provocative Agents in Montebello: the police.avoue. Now, we can finally confimer that these agitators was police truths. We knew that that was done since always, even if the droitists always treated us the insane ones when we affirm that. “.Ces (agents) had the mandate to locate and d’.identifier the nonpeaceful demonstrators for thus avoiding the overflows, specified the SQ in the official statement. The police officers were located by the demonstrators at the time when they refused to launch projectiles.”."En no time, the police officers of the Safety of Quebec acted like provocative or made agents criminal acts. Moreover, this n’.est not in the policies of the service of police force nor in its strategies to d’.agir in this manner. C’.est certe a victory: we made spit a part of the truth to the middle-class authorities, but they always deny l’.essentiel. In this case, if the purpose of these agents were to supervise expressing them, why they wanted to generate chaos. Wouldn't they normally, have remained discrete. Their goal, by sending people in the demonstrations, is to give material to to insult us and, thus, to present a very bad opinion of the protesters at the population. You can follow all the answers to this entry through. 49 Answers towards “.Agents provocative to Montebello: the police.avoue”. And piurtant, you n’.avez at all need pseudo “.agents provocateurs”. to make marde later in the same day. Marde later in the course of the day. Therefore, it did not s’.agissait d’.agents provocative, but rather d’.agents ḏ.infiltration. Completely sizeable and necessary technique. And it is necessary well that quelqu’.un s’.assure of safety at the time of such events, as much of the police officers that demonstrators. It would be sedentary and the police officers would leave them quiet, not. Of course, to ensure the safety with stones the hand and sticks. Jacques, you affirms really something of stupid, c’.était provocative agents indeed. I do not see what you want to say antho. Nothing proves (still) qu’.ils caused the police officers to activate confrontation. If c’.est proven, I will m’.inclinerai and condemn then this tactic, which would be odious. But ḻ.inflitration is a normal police method. I believe qu’.ils rather wanted to base myself with the others to identify the disturbing elements. In general, it is easy, for a few hundreds of dollars, to treat to such informers. Explain me why they had rocks in this case. Why is this qu’.ils would have made to be made recognize. They were to think, like me, that the masked demonstrators were equipped with rocks. I will answer you by a question: why a demonstrator (and not the trade unionist of the video) carries it a mask s’.il n’.a NO intention d’.utiliser violence. One masks oneself not to be made card-index by the middle-class justice which you defends. And also to resist teargas. Me j’.en did not have and j’.en suffered. But, if you n’.avez anything to reproach you, why that disturbs you d’.être card-indexed. The trade unionist of the video did not seem to be afraid d’.être card-indexed, and yet it took part in the same demonstration, not. They will be used if no act of provocation n’.a place, not. Full d’.autres demonstrations has place or anybody n’.est masked. And nobody seems to be afraid d’.être card-indexed. Only 2 categories of manif are equipped as follows: altermondialists and groups of style “.non to violence policière”. In both cases, that almost always finishes in chaos. Which is the true reason d’.un mask, or d’.un veil, if not to hide to make illegal acts. "But, if you n’.avez anything to reproach you, why that disturbs you d’.être card-indexed. C’.est which the Communists and the anarchists are very supervised by your middle-class authorities which are used your interests as rich person. One does not mask oneself to make shit, one hides for the reasons mentioned above. The gases were used because of the provocative agents which you deny. In any event St-pietre your peurdu and you do not want right step l’.admettre. Moreover me j’.y was with a gas mask and j’.ai all vus.J’.etait police mm opposite d’.un with a shield and I absolutely nothing fesait and it my to push several fois.La repressive police force turns into to barter ave the demonstrators a tommate for three lacrimo and a ball of caoutchou. I would like to announce you that the tomatos throw were to use once that the police officers have to begin the ostilitées.Et I only advise the most people possible d’.aller s’.acheter of tomatos rotted with ḻ.epicery once than the police officer starts hostilitées. One sees the three police officers very well making provocation with their rocks but the negationnist St-Pierre once more tries to deny the facts. Why the police force has such fact seeming to stop them. Hey l’.anonyme, your stupidities you come to say them with a name, pigé. It n’.y did not have a grabuge except by these police officers. Of the 4 arrests, 3 are police officers, you look at your truths media or not. Therefore, it did not s’.agissait d’.agents provocative, but rather d’.agents ḏ.infiltration. Completely sizeable and necessary technique. - T’.as nothing included/understood you either pro-terrorism. Stopped T’.es or you listenings only what you like in the news. The agents encouraged the grabuge, c’.est criminal. As s’.ils would encourage the murders, why not if that formed part of ḻ.infiltration. Where will be your limits pro-terrorism. Sti that t’.es without-intention, worse criss. “.Et it is necessary well that quelqu’.un s’.assure of safety at the time of such events, as much of the police officers that demonstrators. - Which s’.occupper will supervise the police officers now qu’.ils encourage the grabuge. They n’.ont no credibility in justice and maintenance of l’.ordre from now on, because moreover, they do that since always. You oses then to treat us dictatorships ambryonnaires. You t’.ai already read again before d’.afficher your messages. It would be sedentary and the police officers would leave them quiet, not. They met on our premises in Quebec these three bandidos, you seized. One does not support the organized crime, nor the terrorists us, then one does not want of them on our premises these shits, pigé. It is known that you support terrorism Jacques pro-terrorism, but t’.as qu’.à to take appointment with them in their residences if you want to see them closely. Now please we and assûmes what your “.vrais médias”. disent…. I do not see what you want to say antho. Nothing proves (still) qu’.ils caused the police officers to activate confrontation. If c’.est proven, I will m’.inclinerai and condemn then this tactic, which would be odious. But ḻ.inflitration is a normal police method. They encouraged the demonstrators to launch stones. They did not infiltrate, they encouraged the garochage stones. “.Je believe qu’.ils rather wanted to be based with the others to identify the disturbing elements. - what you believe and the facts, c’.est 2. Now, assûmes what the forces of middle-class l’.ordre do, they do it for you. In general, it is easy, for a few hundreds of dollars, to treat to such informers. While passing, on more than 1000 demonstrators, c’.est less d’.une score which launches rocks, then avoid generalizing the chairman repressive pro-terrorism. They were to think, like me, that the masked demonstrators were equipped with rocks. My “.pots”. y were without rock in any case. Jacques the chairman repressive pro-terrorism, I never carry mask, still there, a minority relates from there to the batch, then do not generalize. For gases, c’.est of the false whole. They use some sometimes without however having d’.excès l’.autre side. “.Plein d’.autres demonstrations has place or anybody n’.est masked. And nobody seems to be afraid d’.être card-indexed. Only 2 categories of manif are equipped as follows: altermondialists and groups of style “.non to violence policière”. In both cases, that almost always finishes in chaos, reconsider my sentences, I l’.ai says to you that this qu’.une minority n’.était, this n’.est amongst other things not my case. The altermondialists not-are mainly masked and non-violent, pay attention so that you advance chairman repressive pro-terrorism. And right like that, the shits which were in the castle, Harper, Bush, Calderon are criminals. To grip supported a massacre of civil, Bush in made comettre more d’.un and Calderon acted in the same way with the Maffia in Mexico, but of civil pay also over there. Only, never Bush n’.aurait accepted to d’.avoir a Socialist in the south, c’.est clearly. Bush made this qu’.il made, I will not put himself to repeat you the crimes only YOU support. It does not matter, yourself supporting terrorism d’.état and police repression, qu’.as you like credibility to discuss with us. J’.ai l’.empression to discuss with a close relation Taylor (Liberia If I go on your ground with a band of buddies “.imaginaires”. of the Maffia, you will like. Good, c’.est identical and the reasons surrounding all on the secret meeting legitimate even more this demonstration. The center d’.achat is a field “.privé”., the street c’.est with us. The guy supports terrorism à.fond and comes to make his p’.tite moral with 5$…. tata. The version of the SQ is completely twisted. If their provocative agents wanted supposedly to recall to l’.ordre the demonstrators why they brought with them of the projectiles. On the video the only ones which pushes with violence are the disguised cops and the demonstrators drew aside them rather quickly. This n’.est not the first time that provocative agents are used against demonstrators. At the time of the last manif against the police brutality, three breakers were seen with the Cinema Latin Quarter showing their badge of police force. No gas mask, not of gas. No sticks for fesser on material paid by the taxpayers, not of gas. Not to try to cross a perimeter not gas. Pa nire has peace public, not Gas. When t’.agis as a citizen responsible Ben this kind for t’.arrive thing step. Ha j’.oubliais, the only tomatos which j’.avais were in my sandwich and not intended for the police officers. Perhaps you see, to make you pitcher tomatos Ca does not make badly, but Ca causes. But c’.est futil to think that you could include/understand, t’.es convinced that the world is against you and that the government is for t’.écraser. On this, puts back your lungs bus with the reflexion which you have, you surely will breathe d’.autre gas and will eat d’.autres balls of plastic. I know that you do not receive shit badly here ^^. Préservez him the insults nevertheless, being chairman n’.est not a crime, so much qu’.on is responsible:P. On the other hand, let us be serious two seconds. The SQ n’.a not the choice of saying that they are provocative agents infiltrateurs and not agents. Look at the first 2 minutes of the video. You will see the two following things: - One of the infiltrateurs is armed d’.une rock. The trade unionist with l’.avant request with the demonstrator to release his rock, qu’.il has grandparents there here and qu’.ils does not want a grabuge. Other people in the video are not armed, including in back only a policeman in plain clothes l’.est. That does not form part of the disguise and rare are people, even in the rows of the anarchists demonstrators, with being armed. - You will also see that the infiltrated police officers then will hustle the trade unionist to go ahead in front of the police force in a not very subtle way and to leave the manif one. Therefore, one notices an aggressive behavior, a violent gesture and the refusal to release a rock. A normal demonstrator would have understood that people do not want qu’.il lance of the rocks for qu’.on counter-attack with the lacrymo. It is thus supposed very easily that the goal of the police officer WAS indeed d’.utiliser his projectile. It is necessary to analyze the facts qu’.on has, and not to suppose l’.innocence of the type ahead. Police force disguised while expressing, with sunglasses and which holds a rock, which hustles people, c’.est not an agent infiltrator. Anyways, this n’.est not the first case of the kind that l’.on knows. That their allowed to d’.arrêter people of the cell and d’.empirer their case. If not, there was the l’.époque GRC lasting of the FLQ. Therefore, Jacques, I know that l’.on can in extreme cases suppose that the type with a rock with the hand believed that c’.était simply “.élément of déguisement”. According to what j’.ai seen of the police techniques, some have limited an enough IQ and rather obvious prejudices. I wonder, honestly, if to supplement its cover, it does not n’.aurait to launch it to the police officers during the manif one. In my opinion, there are much more chances, in the light of the video, than these agents would have tried to cause l’.affrontement, rather than to collect information. To leave manif surely saved some fallacious arrests. The 3 agents infiltrateurs were stopped, but n’.ont not card-indexed in the arrests. It there thus had 4 real arrests with manif, that is to say 2 men and 2 women. As the 3 infiltrated police officers were men, one knows qu’.ils n’.ont not card-indexed in the file of the arrests. St-Pierre s’.est completely discredited once more. It is unable that police officers infiltrate demonstrations to make violence, thus finding a pretext to make repression. Its mental system l’.empêche to include/understand that. It would be obliged to call in question its ideology. But St-Pierre the negationnist will continue by orgueuil to deny reality. When t’.agis as a citizen responsible Ben this kind for t’.arrive thing step. A responsible citizen precisely includes/understands qu’.un top like that which took place n’.a not reason d’.être and thus leaves in the rue…. Before making morals with the others, creates to you an account. I believe qu’.ils rather wanted to base myself with the others to identify the disturbing elements. Me j’.y were and in my opinion a supposed agent to observe n’.a not need d’.une rock. you really do not know what you speak and you should keep your commantaires idiotic for toi…. Pauvre St-Pierre when you will acknowledge that you A twists and has 100%. You see it well that all the arguments are against you and you continuous to believe has your stupidity